Sign In / Sign Out
Navigation for Entire University
- ASU Home
- My ASU
- Colleges and Schools
- Map and Locations
All academic programs are expected to participate in assessment. Different programs will have different reporting expectations depenedent on their program status. Programs can find their program status in the "Program Status Table" of the assessment portal. Reporting expectations for each program status can be found in the table below.
Continuous improvement of our programs is an important priority for educators who want to do everything possible to prepare our graduates to perform in society, in the workplace, or in graduate school. Assessment planning and reporting allow faculty to report the specific learning outcomes they desire for their graduates and to collect solid evidence of how well those outcomes have been achieved. Assessment is required to maintain institutional accreditation as well as specialized program accreditation.
The Higher Learning Commission of the North Central Association of Colleges and Schools, ASU’s regional accrediting body, places a particularly heavy emphasis on assessment. Assessment is at the core of Criteria Three and Four of HLC’s Criteria for Accreditation, as well as being emphasized in the Documenting Fundamental Understandings: Minimum Expectations within the Criteria for Accreditation. Nearly all of those accreditation agencies require evidence of the assessment of student learning and continuous improvement.
Before a new plan can be submitted to the Office of the University Provost it must have an assessment plan approved by the University Office of Evaluation and Educational Effectiveness. UOEEE understands that many aspects of the new program may not be in place yet, and that students may not reach measurement points until two or more years from the time of approval. It is important, however, for program faculty to know the intended program outcomes at the time a program is created. Assessment plans can be revised in the future as the program evolves. It is equally important for faculty to identify where in the new curriculum that students will be exposed to program content, have opportunities to reinforce initial learning on that content, and ultimately to demonstrate their knowledge of the content. You may find it helpful to develop a curriculum map at this point.
The assessment team will review your draft plan and either approve it or return it for revision. When the recommended revisions have been made, please submit the plan for final review. The assessment team will notify you when the plan has been approved and a copy of the approval will be available online and emailed to the assessment plan contact person.
The assessment team is available to assist you with assessment planning and curriculum mapping. You will be asked to update or approve the continuation of your assessment plan each year when you submit your assessment report. Assessment reports are due September 30 of each year.
Commonly, the academic year is thought of as Fall to Spring with Summer as an optional component at the end. The UOEEE academic year reporting, however, is centered around a Summer to Spring reporting cycle, thus survey and course evaluation data which may be used in an assessment plan, consists of graduates for the Summer through Spring terms for a given academic year. We encourage assessment reporting for each academic year to consist of courses, student materials and other data collected from Summer through Spring terms, however reports may include a different definition of the academic year if this corresponds better with the department’s needs.
New Plan Proposal: The information collected in the Measures and Methods section of the UOEEE New Assessment Plan portal will be used to help complete the Assessment Methods and Measure sections of new program proposals being submitted to the Office of the University Provost and subsequently the Arizona Board of Regents for approval. Other necessary new program submission information is collected by the Office of the University Provost using the ChangeMaker system.
Annual Reporting: Reporting to the Office of the University Provost each year includes to the number of reports that are identified as being exemplary by UOEEE, as well as those not containing enough information to assessment activities. In addition, all comments are made available for review my program overseers include the Provost's Office and college administrators, delegates and designees.
Both are important activities, necessary for continued improvement, but the purposes and timelines are different. Assessment is an ongoing process that occurs during each academic year and focuses on student-specific outcomes for a single academic major or certificate program. An academic program review occurs every few years. It is used as a comprehensive evaluation of the overall effectiveness of an entire academic unit that may administer multiple degree programs at both the undergraduate and graduate levels. Although an academic program review self-study will include information from the assessment activities of the unit’s programs, it will also provide information about the unit’s human and non-human resources, faculty qualifications, scholarship and service activities, and more.
Student learning is the major component for determining institutional effectiveness. Though a review of institutional effectiveness will assess additional avenues of institutional activities, it is important for programs to assess their outcomes with the goals of the college and institution in mind. With this core principle established and integrated into the activities of the program, the best data will be available for assessing the mission statement of the university.
Yes. Although most programmatic accreditors now require evidence that programs are measuring student learning, some still do not. We are still accountable to our institutional accreditation body for the assessment of student learning. There are some specialized accreditors that require programs to engage in the assessment of student learning, but are not prescriptive about how that should occur. Such agencies rely on the programs to participate in the institutional assessment activities and to document the evidence of those activities.
No. The purpose of academic program assessment is not to evaluate individual students or instructors. The purpose is to determine the extent to which program graduates possess the intended knowledge and skills of the program when they graduate, and to use the information gathered to support improvements over time.
No. The assessment team does not keep a tally of the number of outcomes met – or not. We do not report these numbers to deans, the provost, the state regents, the accreditors, or to anyone else. We do, however, maintain logs of units that have current assessment documents on file, and the quality of those documents. We provide feedback to units on whether their assessment practices are likely to provide meaningful information about student learning that can be used to improve learning over time. This is so important that units who identify simplistic outcomes, weak measures, and unreasonably low performance criteria receive lower ratings than units who set reasonable expectations, acknowledge when outcomes have not been met, and identify realistic changes to address any issues they identify. As an institution, we are evaluated by accreditors not on the number of outcomes we meet, but on the quality of evidence that we actively engage in the honest assessment of student learning at our institution. “Closing the Loop,” the process whereby program faculty use assessment information to drive decision-making that is aimed at improved student learning is the sole purpose of program assessment, and is the basis on which our assessment efforts are evaluated – internally and externally.
Remember: We are not “graded” on the number of outcomes we meet, but on our efforts to collect meaningful information about student learning and then use that information to improve student learning.
Though both activities are used to measure the degrees to which students have learning concepts, grading is measure upon individual students whereas assessment focuses on the performance and gains of an entire cohort of students. Additionally,
UOEEE has graduate and alumni survey results available to college delegates, designees and other authorized University personnel. If you are not authorized to access this information, contact your college delegate for assistance. Link to Survey Reporting page: https://uoeee.asu.edu/survey-reporting
To assist units in the assessment planning process, we created a handbook: Program Assessment Handbook. Please refer to this handbook as you create your assessment plans and reports. To access this handbook, please authenticate using your ASURITE.
The following link will open the UOEEE Assessment Portal where all assessment plan development and reporting activities take place.